Keller v. Aymond

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Keller v. Aymond

717 So. 2d 1151, 1998 La. LEXIS 1166, 1998 WL 236124

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 23, 1998·No. Nos. 98-CA-0552, 98-CA-0553·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Plaintiffs invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court pursuant to La. Const. Art. V, § 5(D), on ground that the district court declared the Electronic Surveillance Act, La. R.S. 15:1301 et sea., unconstitutional.

[1152] Our independent review of the record reveals that the trial court’s judgment never rendered the Act unconstitutional. Having concluded that we have no appellate jurisdiction, this appeal is ordered transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

KNOLL, J., not on panel (recused). Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Plaintiffs invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court pursuant to La. Const. Art. V, § 5(D), on ground that the district court declared the Electronic Surveillance Act, La. R.S. 15:1301 et sea., unconstitutional.

[1152] Our independent review of the record reveals that the trial court’s judgment never rendered the Act unconstitutional. Having concluded that we have no appellate jurisdiction, this appeal is ordered transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.

KNOLL, J., not on panel (recused). Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey P. Victory Justice, Supreme Court of Louisiana

Keller v. Aymond, 717 So. 2d 1151, 1998 La. LEXIS 1166, 1998 WL 236124 (La. 1998).

Pincite

717 So. 2d 1151 (Keller v. Aymond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related