Keller v. About, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-00228
StatusUnknown

This text of Keller v. About, Inc. (Keller v. About, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keller v. About, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JACKELYN KELLER, Plaintiff, Case No: 1:21-cv-00228-JMF v.

ABOUT, INC. d/b/a DOTDASH, Defendant.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties to Jackelyn Keller v. About, Inc. d/b/a Dotdash, by and through their respective counsel of record, that in order to facilitate the exchange of information and documents which may be subject to confidentiality limitations on disclosure due to federal laws, state laws, and privacy rights, the Parties stipulate as follows: 1. In this Stipulation and Protective Order, the words set forth below shall have the following meanings: a. “Proceeding” means the above-entitled proceeding, Case Number 1:21-cv- 00228 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, or any arbitration of Plaintiff’s claims. b. “Court” means the Hon. Jesse M. Furman or the Hon. Ona T. Wang, or any other judge to which this Proceeding may be assigned, including Court staff participating in such proceedings. c. “Arbitrator” means any arbitrator to which this Proceeding may be assigned, including JAMS staff participating in such proceedings. d. “Confidential” means any information which is in the possession of a Designating Party who believes in good faith that such information is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. e. “Confidential Materials” means any Documents, Testimony or Information as defined below designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order. f. “Designating Party” means the Party that designates Materials as “Confidential.” g. “Disclose” or “Disclosed” or “Disclosure” means to reveal, divulge, give, or make available Materials, or any part thereof, or any information contained therein. h. “Documents” means (i) any “Writing,” “Original,” and “Duplicate” as those terms are defined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Evidence, which have been produced in discovery in this Proceeding by any person, and (ii) any copies, reproductions, or summaries of all or any part of the foregoing. i. “Information” means the content of Documents or Testimony. j. “Testimony” means all depositions, declarations or other testimony taken or used in this Proceeding. 2. The Designating Party shall have the right to designate as “Confidential” any Documents, Testimony or Information that the Designating Party in good faith believes to contain non-public information that is entitled to confidential treatment under applicable law. 3. The entry of this Stipulation and Protective Order does not alter, waive, modify, or abridge any right, privilege or protection otherwise available to any Party with respect to the discovery of matters, including but not limited to any Party’s right to assert the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, or other privileges, or any Party’s right to contest any such assertion. 4. Any Documents, Testimony or Information to be designated as “Confidential” must be clearly so designated before the Document, Testimony or Information is Disclosed or produced. The parties may agree that the case name and number are to be part of the “Confidential” designation. The ”Confidential” designation should not obscure or interfere with the legibility of the designated Information. a. For Documents (apart from transcripts of depositions or other arbitration proceedings), the Designating Party must affix the legend “Confidential” on each page of any Document containing such designated Confidential Material. b. For Testimony given in depositions the Designating Party may identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, all “Confidential” Testimony, by specifying all portions of the Testimony that qualify as “Confidential.” c. For Information produced in some form other than Documents, and for any other tangible items, including, without limitation, compact discs or DVDs, the Designating Party must affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the Information or item is stored the legend “Confidential.” If only portions of the Information or item warrant protection, the Designating Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the “Confidential” portions. 5. The inadvertent production by any of the undersigned Parties or non-Parties to the Proceedings of any Document, Testimony or Information during discovery in this Proceeding without a “Confidential” designation, shall be without prejudice to any claim that such item is “Confidential” and such Party shall not be held to have waived any rights by such inadvertent production. In the event that any Document, Testimony or Information that is subject to a “Confidential” designation is inadvertently produced without such designation, the Party that inadvertently produced the document shall give written notice of such inadvertent production within twenty (20) days of discovery of the inadvertent production, together with a further copy of the subject Document, Testimony or Information designated as “Confidential” (the “Inadvertent Production Notice”). Upon receipt of such Inadvertent Production Notice, the Party that received the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information shall promptly destroy the inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information and all copies thereof, or, at the expense of the producing Party, return such together with all copies of such Document, Testimony or Information to counsel for the producing Party and shall retain only the “Confidential” designated Materials. Should the receiving Party choose to destroy such inadvertently produced Document, Testimony or Information, the receiving Party shall notify the producing Party in writing of such destruction within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the inadvertent production. This provision is not intended to apply to any inadvertent production of any Information protected by attorney-client or work product privileges. In the event that this provision conflicts with any applicable law regarding waiver of confidentiality through the inadvertent production of Documents, Testimony or Information, such law shall govern. 6. In the event that counsel for a Party receiving Documents, Testimony or Information in discovery designated as “Confidential” objects to such designation with respect to any or all of such items, said counsel shall advise counsel for the Designating Party, in writing, of such objections, the specific Documents, Testimony or Information to which each objection pertains, and the specific reasons and support for such objections (the “Designation Objections”). Counsel for the Designating Party shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the written Designation Objections to either (a) agree in writing to de-designate Documents, Testimony or Information pursuant to any or all of the Designation Objections and/or (b) file a motion with the Court or Arbitrator seeking to uphold any or all designations on Documents, Testimony or Information addressed by the Designation Objections (the “Designation Motion”). Pending a resolution of the Designation Motion by the Court or Arbitrator, any and all existing designations on the Documents, Testimony or Information at issue in such Motion shall remain in place. The Designating Party shall have the burden on any Designation Motion of establishing the applicability of its “Confidential” designation. In the event that the designation Objections are neither timely agreed to nor timely addressed in the Designation Motion, then such Documents, Testimony or Information shall be de-designated in accordance with the Designation Objection applicable to such material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Keller v. About, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keller-v-about-inc-nysd-2021.