Keller, Daniel

• Court: Texas Supreme Court
• Decided: February 17, 2015
• Docket: WR-36,232-02
• Status: Published

Opinion

HE©EB B…/ED BN

ZOWQF cm¢l$NALAPPEALS

`7"@ -/h/_~" m@'mée.rs @J` 1£/1¢? Cou,rPEB 172915 /'17 A/nmw',s ?r_md.zu_ Han.~rou nay 73 T HAVE w¢“¢`Tl'-’ "/ovL $EWG'ML T\mb§#§msm’ Cg@rk /Z¢='szaimq m\c £~¢-Luv'-Fe’ fmm.\ce's /CL>LL¢?F Am) l~!nve r~`\'o'r two A R.c.='s',o°~c¢: hamm -me' E‘>`\.¢.¢~'T. ¥’JU.\~ce“s AuA llcr £4. blushn~é DmJ wCFC. `1?,£?(..@/*-\:¢2‘9 from PrLL.Sol-) H-\ Nou. afg_@t% 'l` wm mmrn€b 419 H¢v from 2006 +¢> 3~27~¢‘§ A`f T\m'r =r\w\ur sz Divor<;:.~o mE wew+ back 4\> Ha¢ E\c- Dml, I (-(ea.¢¢\ ¢J¢-H-\ir.lq $ro¢~r\ H¢'_¢' 7L;M€ of BB’LL¥A$L~“ un‘f»\- -l-h€. pivorc€ z uYAcl spe-$ 4\1\4>\»$/¥~$$ ap Do(lnf§ $u.ppan.‘rmq H.»:( ovc»’ 4~\-\€ `I'<’ev¢$ /H~MS 1 Los'r l_vnsr'f-$N'vq 1 kind csasz $p‘ -.I lr{~ j mm ¢E’N~('¢'\[‘ED 40 Comv€w$n'(»’b~\ from /~/L".)Z. :l' Do»r!' \-h\\/¢z ~H-c mo~»y op Cr`&d + 4b parade Lv:gm. periods AGmsT plan 'I ALSo \~r M__L Cum-@e; AG:NS? H\=“R.. § ]` Ahr\`n Po¢>f' mmi Lo¢k:ug far l~chp. £v§‘)~) +o -(-`;\\z’ m C;v¢`L. Lm..» .S¢M`.'}é. ?la-'ML»~ Do ua+ Zxo~£A-/F, 7¢/./¢.' /CL»*LL¢?»"S. +/JL=Y Ar‘c éu.‘L ?@ap\r:, `.T Woc~LA L;\¢»z -\'¢, 1-\<2m~ {5;»¢\< from ‘(ou` -+e LLH.\¢\ me s»\o»._\ 3 nw ,;2_¢,~45~,\,»,- L¢“§m, /Jcbl,a. V/-\,`\é »H\c owl come ¢4` ~\'&\e~ IcFLLc;»~r CGS'¢?.

w+k rhch fle“q§ped"

RG¥~\\)»¢U \Aon,‘?o¢».\ (>.0. ®¢>X <9?3 Gn+c$vi\\€,'f$. 7(»528