Kelleher v. Atkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelleher v. Atkinson

201 A.D. 876

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D. 876 (Kelleher v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelleher v. Atkinson, 201 A.D. 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order [877]*877reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Held, that the charge made at the request of plaintiff’s counsel “ that the defendant is held to the highest degree of care in the operation of the elevators, consistent with their efficient use,” constitutes reversible error. (Griffen v. Manice, 166 N. Y. 188; O’Brien v. New York Railways Co., 185 App. Div. 867.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order [877]*877reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Held, that the charge made at the request of plaintiff’s counsel “ that the defendant is held to the highest degree of care in the operation of the elevators, consistent with their efficient use,” constitutes reversible error. (Griffen v. Manice, 166 N. Y. 188; O’Brien v. New York Railways Co., 185 App. Div. 867.) All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D. 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelleher-v-atkinson-nyappdiv-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack