Kellam v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Kellam v. State

259 So. 2d 869, 47 Ala. App. 660, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1012

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 28, 1972

Docket8 Div. 164

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 259 So. 2d 869 (Kellam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kellam v. State, 259 So. 2d 869, 47 Ala. App. 660, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1012 (Ala. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Ike Kellam, was tried and convicted, upon an indictment charging murder in the first degree, of murder in the second degree and sentenced to ten years in the state penitentiary. The evidence was entirely circumstantial. Appel[661]*661lant challenges its sufficiency by a motion for a new trial.

The state’s evidence is as follows: Deceased sold bootleg liquor in her home. Several witnesses testified to the defendant’s presence in the duplex apartment with the deceased the evening of the killing. The defendant and the deceased argued and scuffled. Defendant was the last person seen with the deceased. One witness testified to having left for ten minutes and on his return met the defendant a block from deceased’s apartment, yelling “like Tarzan.” He went on to deceased’s home and saw her lying on the floor. Immediately preceding the gun shot in deceased’s home, her neighbor in the duplex testified to observing a man dressed in a coat and overalls standing on the porch arguing with defendant. The defendant was arrested within the hour dressed in overalls and a coat. He had on his person a pistol which smelled as if it had recently been fired. Empty shells were found on the premises of the defendant’s home by officers who testified that in their opinion the shells were recently fired. The deceased was shot through the eye, the bullet exited through the top of the head and was never found. There was also a bullet hole in the ceiling. Upon arrest the defendant, not in response to questioning, volunteered the statements, “I should have done what I started to do, then I would be dead, too,” and “I told her I would do it.”

No evidence was introduced in defendant’s behalf. In this case the circumstantial evidence not only conclusively points to the defendant but precludes any reasonable hypothesis of someone else being the guilty agent. Bluth v. State, 38 Ala.App. 692, 92 So.2d 685. Where evidence supports a verdict of guilty the court of criminal appeals will not disturb a ruling of the trial court in denying a motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.

CATES, ALMON and TYSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Ike Kellam, was tried and convicted, upon an indictment charging murder in the first degree, of murder in the second degree and sentenced to ten years in the state penitentiary. The evidence was entirely circumstantial. Appel[661]*661lant challenges its sufficiency by a motion for a new trial.

The state’s evidence is as follows: Deceased sold bootleg liquor in her home. Several witnesses testified to the defendant’s presence in the duplex apartment with the deceased the evening of the killing. The defendant and the deceased argued and scuffled. Defendant was the last person seen with the deceased. One witness testified to having left for ten minutes and on his return met the defendant a block from deceased’s apartment, yelling “like Tarzan.” He went on to deceased’s home and saw her lying on the floor. Immediately preceding the gun shot in deceased’s home, her neighbor in the duplex testified to observing a man dressed in a coat and overalls standing on the porch arguing with defendant. The defendant was arrested within the hour dressed in overalls and a coat. He had on his person a pistol which smelled as if it had recently been fired. Empty shells were found on the premises of the defendant’s home by officers who testified that in their opinion the shells were recently fired. The deceased was shot through the eye, the bullet exited through the top of the head and was never found. There was also a bullet hole in the ceiling. Upon arrest the defendant, not in response to questioning, volunteered the statements, “I should have done what I started to do, then I would be dead, too,” and “I told her I would do it.”

No evidence was introduced in defendant’s behalf. In this case the circumstantial evidence not only conclusively points to the defendant but precludes any reasonable hypothesis of someone else being the guilty agent. Bluth v. State, 38 Ala.App. 692, 92 So.2d 685. Where evidence supports a verdict of guilty the court of criminal appeals will not disturb a ruling of the trial court in denying a motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.

CATES, ALMON and TYSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 2d 869, 47 Ala. App. 660, 1972 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kellam-v-state-alacrimapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack