Keli‘ihananui v. Evans
This text of Keli‘ihananui v. Evans (Keli‘ihananui v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-10-0000237 10-JAN-2011 02:20 PM
NO. SCOT-10-0000237
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
JANICE K. M. CHUNG KELI'IHANANUI, Petitioner,
vs.
GENE EVANS and BRUCE KAM, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.
and Circuit Judge Chang, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon review of the complaints filed in the supreme
court by complainant Janice K. M. Chung Keli'ihananui, it appears
that we lack jurisdiction to consider complainant’s claims of
cruel and unusual punishment. See HRS § 602-5 (Supp. 2009).
Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaints are dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 10, 2011.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
/s/ Gary W.B. Chang
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Keli‘ihananui v. Evans, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelia-ihananui-v-evans-haw-2011.