Keles v. Galil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keles v. Galil

115 A.D.3d 450, 981 N.Y.S.2d 527

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.3d 450 (Keles v. Galil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keles v. Galil, 115 A.D.3d 450, 981 N.Y.S.2d 527 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered January 13, 2012, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the three actions with prejudice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Because these three actions assert claims that arise from the same transactions involved in plaintiff’s 2008 action against some of these same defendants (see Keles v Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y., 74 AD3d 435 [1st Dept 2010], lv dismissed 16 NY3d 890 [2011], cert denied 565 US —, 132 S Ct 255 [2011]), the prior dismissal of that action acts as a bar to the instant claims under the doctrine of res judicata (see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]; UBS Sec. LLC v Highland Capital Mgt., L.P., 86 AD3d 469, 473-474 [1st Dept 2011] [doctrine of res judicata extends to parties and their privies]).

Concur — Saxe, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered January 13, 2012, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the three actions with prejudice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Because these three actions assert claims that arise from the same transactions involved in plaintiff’s 2008 action against some of these same defendants (see Keles v Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y., 74 AD3d 435 [1st Dept 2010], lv dismissed 16 NY3d 890 [2011], cert denied 565 US —, 132 S Ct 255 [2011]), the prior dismissal of that action acts as a bar to the instant claims under the doctrine of res judicata (see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]; UBS Sec. LLC v Highland Capital Mgt., L.P., 86 AD3d 469, 473-474 [1st Dept 2011] [doctrine of res judicata extends to parties and their privies]).

Concur — Saxe, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.3d 450, 981 N.Y.S.2d 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keles-v-galil-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack