Kelchner v. John Deere Co.

547 N.E.2d 100, 74 N.Y.2d 890, 547 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3148
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 26, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 547 N.E.2d 100 (Kelchner v. John Deere Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelchner v. John Deere Co., 547 N.E.2d 100, 74 N.Y.2d 890, 547 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3148 (N.Y. 1989).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appel[891]*891late Division order which affirmed the denial of defendants and third-party plaintiffs’ motion for renewal and rehearing, and insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the grant of summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim as against Kenneth Kelchner, dismissed upon the ground that that order and portion of an order do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crotta v. Home Depot, Inc.
732 A.2d 767 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
547 N.E.2d 100, 74 N.Y.2d 890, 547 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 3148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelchner-v-john-deere-co-ny-1989.