Keivan A. Tavakoli v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This text of Keivan A. Tavakoli v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Keivan A. Tavakoli v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 17, 2019.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00312-CV
KEIVAN A. TAVAKOLI, Appellant V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-00954-2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Molberg Since filing his notice of appeal, appellant has taken no further action in this appeal. He
has not paid the $205 filing fee, filed the docketing statement, requested the reporter’s record, or
paid for the clerk’s record. By separate letters dated March 13, 2019, we informed appellant that
the $205 filing fee and docketing statement were due and instructed him to file both within ten
days. We cautioned appellant that, if he failed to comply, the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 5, 32.1. To date, appellant has not paid the fee, filed a docketing statement, or otherwise
communicated with the Court.
By letter dated April 24, 2019, we notified appellant that the district clerk had not filed the
clerk’s record because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record.
We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification that payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record had been made or that appellant had been found to be entitled to
proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that we might dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution if appellant failed to provide the required documentation by May 6, 2019. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On May 7, 2019, the district clerk filed a second letter informing the Court
that appellant had still not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. And to date,
we have had no response or other communication from appellant.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX.R.APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b),(c).
/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
190312F.P05
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
KEIVAN A. TAVAKOLI, Appellant On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas No. 05-19-00312-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 219-00954-2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee Justices Myers and Carlyle participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant KEIVAN A. TAVAKOLI.
Judgment entered this 17th day of May, 2019.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Keivan A. Tavakoli v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keivan-a-tavakoli-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-texapp-2019.