Keitt v. State
16 So. 3d 261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11597, 2009 WL 2517053
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Keitt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 999 So. 2d 658 →
Opinion
Ingemar Keitt challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) in which he alleges that he did not have the requisite predicate offenses to support his sentencing enhancement. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Though the order denying relief referenced a state’s response, the state advises that it had not been ordered to respond to the rule 3.800 motion. Rather, it responded to a rule 3.850 motion that had been pending as well.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keitt v. State, 16 So. 3d 261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11597, 2009 WL 2517053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
16 So. 3d 261 (Keitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shermer v. State
16 So. 3d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)