Keithley v. State

556 S.W.3d 127
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 18, 2018
DocketWD 81400
StatusPublished

This text of 556 S.W.3d 127 (Keithley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keithley v. State, 556 S.W.3d 127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Donnie Keithley appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion. He complains on appeal that the trial court plainly erred in applying sentence enhancement factors that elevated his conviction from a misdemeanor to a felony. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 S.W.3d 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keithley-v-state-moctapp-2018.