Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel

Fourth Circuit

Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel

697 F. App'x 250

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 26, 2017·No. 17-6555·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Bryan Webb, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of. the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Figiel, No. 5:16-ev-00044-FPS-RWT, 2017 WL 1147470 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2017). We deny Webb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Bryan Webb, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of. the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. Figiel, No. 5:16-ev-00044-FPS-RWT, 2017 WL 1147470 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2017). We deny Webb’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel, 697 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

697 F. App'x 250 (Keith Webb v. Steven Figiel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related