Keith Webb Hayes v. United States

399 F.2d 691, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5816
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 12, 1968·No. 25202·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate a judgment of guilty of the offense of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a).

Appellant contends that he was mentally incompetent when he waived counsel and pleaded guilty on September 20, 1962. As § 2255 sets in train the likelihood of the return of the prisoner for a hearing and the Court has a right to require some specific facts regarding the claimed prior mental history, background, or incidents of aberration to support the conclusory allegations, the district court was correct in its denial of this motion without an evidentiary *692 hearing. McCaffrey v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 328 F.2d 606; Wheeler v. United States, 8 Cir., 1965, 340 F.2d 119; Hartman v. United States, 6 Cir., 1962, 310 F.2d 447; Santos v. United States, 1 Cir., 1962, 305 F.2d 372; and Bishop v. United States, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 117, 223 F.2d 582 (1955), vacated and remanded, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956), is not to the contrary.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith Webb Hayes v. United States, 399 F.2d 691, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5816 (5th Cir. 1968).

399 F.2d 691 (Keith Webb Hayes v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Bell
458 F. Supp. 1044 (M.D. Alabama, 1978)
Richard William Payne v. United States
539 F.2d 443 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Barrett v. United States
300 F. Supp. 1060 (D. Minnesota, 1969)