Keith Wayne Parr v. State
This text of Keith Wayne Parr v. State (Keith Wayne Parr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-07-0236-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JULY 6, 2007 ______________________________
KEITH WAYNE PARR,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 251st DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 17513-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING _______________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Appellant, Keith Wayne Parr, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled
substance in a drug-free zone. The certification of right to appeal executed by the trial
court states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case and the Defendant has NO right
of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” This circumstance was
brought to the attention of appellant, and opportunity was granted him to obtain an
amended certification entitling him to appeal. No such certification was received within the time we allotted. Having received no certification authorizing an appeal, we dismiss the
appeal per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).
The appeal is dismissed.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Keith Wayne Parr v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-wayne-parr-v-state-texapp-2007.