Keith Walker v. Iowa Department of Corrections
This text of 611 F. App'x 371 (Keith Walker v. Iowa Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action under the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Pérsons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc-l to 2000cc-5, Iowa prisoner Herevel Ben-Kushi, also known as Keith Walker (Walker), appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his post-judgment motion asking that the court hold defendants in contempt for violating a 2006 order. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the contempt motion, see Wycoff v. Hedgepeth, 34 F.3d 614, 616 (8th Cir.1994) (standard of review); in denying Walker’s motion for reconsideration, see Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., 243 F.3d 486, 498 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review); or in denying appointed counsel, see Phillips v. Jasper Cty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review).
*372 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
611 F. App'x 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-walker-v-iowa-department-of-corrections-ca8-2015.