Keith W. Lorenzen v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Clearview of Clinton, Inc., Third Party

701 F.2d 408, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29323
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1983
Docket82-4348
StatusPublished

This text of 701 F.2d 408 (Keith W. Lorenzen v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Clearview of Clinton, Inc., Third Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keith W. Lorenzen v. South Central Bell Telephone Company, Defendant-Third Party v. Clearview of Clinton, Inc., Third Party, 701 F.2d 408, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29323 (3d Cir. 1983).

Opinion

701 F.2d 408

Keith W. LORENZEN, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-Third Party
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CLEARVIEW OF CLINTON, INC., Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82-4348
Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

March 28, 1983.

Downey & Brown, Jackson, Miss., Rexford T. Brown, Jackson, Miss., for Clearview of Clinton, Inc.

Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, W. Scott Welch, III, George H. Butler, Roger M. Flynt, Jr., Jackson, Miss., for South Central Bell Telephone Co.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Walter L. Nixon, Jr., Judge.

Before RUBIN, REAVLEY and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

AFFIRMED for the reasons given by the district court. 546 F.Supp. 694 (S.D.Miss.1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lorenzen v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.
546 F. Supp. 694 (S.D. Mississippi, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 F.2d 408, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-w-lorenzen-v-south-central-bell-telephone-company-defendant-third-ca3-1983.