Keith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

240 So. 2d 202
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 1970·No. No. 70-310·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, by this third amended complaint, sought specific performance to compel arbitration of an insurance agreement. The trial court dismissed same and this appeal ensued. We reverse.

Although the complaint for specific performance was erroneously labeled and contained many allegations immaterial to the relief available, we find that same was sufficient to meet the requirements of § 682.-17, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. and should have been considered as a motion under said section.

Therefore, the order under review be and the same is hereby reversed, with directions to grant the plaintiff a hearing upon his third amended complaint, considering it as a motion filed pursuant to § 682.17, Fla. Stat., F.S.A.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 240 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

240 So. 2d 202 (Keith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Paperworkers International v. ITT Rayonier, Inc.
740 F. Supp. 833 (M.D. Florida, 1990)
Nigaglioni v. Century Insurance Co. of New York
281 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Whitfield v. CENTURY INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK
281 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)