Keith v. Kelley
This text of 2010 Ohio 1807 (Keith v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, Jeffrey C. Keith, for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Keith from filing a successive habeas corpus petition insofar as he raises claims that he either raised or could have raised in his previous petition. Amstutz v. Eberlin, 119 Ohio St.3d 421, 2008-Ohio-4538, 894 N.E.2d 1219, ¶ 7; Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio-1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067. Moreover, as the court of appeals held, Keith’s initial sentence is not void and has not expired, and he has or had an adequate *162 remedy by appeal to raise his claims that the trial court judges were improperly assigned to his criminal cases. See Keith at ¶ 12, 14.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 Ohio 1807, 125 Ohio St. 3d 161, 2010 WL 1727890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-v-kelley-ohio-2010.