Keith v. Jones

9 Johns. 120
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1812·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The first count in the declaration, and to which there is a general demurrer, is good. The note therein stated is a negotiable note, under the statute; and being declared to be paya* [121]*121ble in York state bills or specie, is the same thing as being made payable in lawful current money of the state ; for the bills mentioned mean bank paper, which is here, in conformity with common usage and common understanding, regarded as cash.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith v. Jones, 9 Johns. 120 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1812).

9 Johns. 120 (Keith v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Klauber v. Biggerstaff
47 Wis. 551 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Huse v. Hamblin
29 Iowa 501 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)
Butler v. Paine
8 Minn. 324 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1863)
Blood v. Northup
1 Kan. 28 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1862)
Swetland v. Creigh
15 Ohio St. 118 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1846)
Carleton v. Brooks
14 N.H. 149 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1843)
Farwell v. White
7 Mo. 595 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1842)
Hasbrook v. Palmer
11 F. Cas. 766 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1839)
Leiber v. Goodrich
5 Cow. 186 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)