Keith v. Fork

31 S.E. 169, 105 Ga. 511, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 652
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 26, 1898·Published

Opinion

Cobb, J.

This being an action by the holder of a negotiable promissory-note, who acquired the same for value and before due, and the record failing to disclose any evidence showing any fact inconsistent with good faith on the part of the holder, or that he had notice or reasonable grounds to suspect the existence of any defect in, or defense to, the note, a verdict in favor of the maker on a plea of failure of consideration was contrary to law and should have been set aside. Bank of Stewart County v. Adams, 96 Ga. 529.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith v. Fork, 31 S.E. 169, 105 Ga. 511, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 652 (Ga. 1898).

31 S.E. 169 (Keith v. Fork) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Stewart County v. Adams
23 S.E. 496 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)