Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 98, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 449
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 31, 1917·No. 8835·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Where there is no fraud on the part of the vendor of real estate which prevents inspection thereof, and the purchaser fails to exercise diligence by inspecting the property, a plea of failure of consideration on account of its physical condition or environment will not be entertained. Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 123 (92 S. E. 893) ; Hanes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 129 (92 S. E. 896) ; Martin v. Harwell, 115 Ga. 156 (3) (41 S. E. 686).

2. The plea set up no legal defense, and the trial judge did not err in sustaining the demurrer to it.

'Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 98, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 264 (Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckham v. Avera Loan & Investment Co.
114 S.E. 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)