Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
This text of 94 S.E. 264 (Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where there is no fraud on the part of the vendor of real estate which prevents inspection thereof, and the purchaser fails to exercise diligence by inspecting the property, a plea of failure of consideration on account of its physical condition or environment will not be entertained. Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 123 (92 S. E. 893) ; Hanes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 129 (92 S. E. 896) ; Martin v. Harwell, 115 Ga. 156 (3) (41 S. E. 686).
2. The plea set up no legal defense, and the trial judge did not err in sustaining the demurrer to it.
'Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 98, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-v-farmers-merchants-bank-gactapp-1917.