Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 98, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 449
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 31, 1917
Docket8835
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 264 (Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keith v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 98, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Where there is no fraud on the part of the vendor of real estate which prevents inspection thereof, and the purchaser fails to exercise diligence by inspecting the property, a plea of failure of consideration on account of its physical condition or environment will not be entertained. Sloan v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 123 (92 S. E. 893) ; Hanes v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 20 Ga. App. 129 (92 S. E. 896) ; Martin v. Harwell, 115 Ga. 156 (3) (41 S. E. 686).

2. The plea set up no legal defense, and the trial judge did not err in sustaining the demurrer to it.

'Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beckham v. Avera Loan & Investment Co.
114 S.E. 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 264, 21 Ga. App. 98, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-v-farmers-merchants-bank-gactapp-1917.