Keith v. Day
359 S.E.2d 466, 320 N.C. 629, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2327
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 3, 1987
DocketNo. 474PA86
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases
This text of 359 S.E.2d 466 (Keith v. Day) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Keith v. Day, 359 S.E.2d 466, 320 N.C. 629, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2327 (N.C. 1987).
Opinion
After hearing oral argument and considering the new briefs, the Court concludes that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Riverwalk Condos. of Wilmington Unit Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Gallan Holdings, LLC
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
Copypro, Inc. v. Musgrove
754 S.E.2d 188 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. Harders
747 S.E.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Catoe v. Helms Construction & Concrete Co.
372 S.E.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Catoe v. Helms Const. & Concrete Co.
372 S.E.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall
361 S.E.2d 292 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
359 S.E.2d 466, 320 N.C. 629, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-v-day-nc-1987.