Keith v. Day
359 S.E.2d 466, 320 N.C. 629, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2327
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 3, 1987·No. No. 474PA86·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
After hearing oral argument and considering the new briefs, the Court concludes that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
Discretionary review improvidently allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keith v. Day, 359 S.E.2d 466, 320 N.C. 629, 1987 N.C. LEXIS 2327 (N.C. 1987).
359 S.E.2d 466 (Keith v. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Riverwalk Condos. of Wilmington Unit Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Gallan Holdings, LLC
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
Copypro, Inc. v. Musgrove
754 S.E.2d 188 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014)
Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. Harders
747 S.E.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
Catoe v. Helms Construction & Concrete Co.
372 S.E.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
Catoe v. Helms Const. & Concrete Co.
372 S.E.2d 331 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall
361 S.E.2d 292 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)