Keith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Keith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

117 F. App'x 281

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 23, 2004

Docket04-1925

StatusUnpublished

This text of 117 F. App'x 281 (Keith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 117 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin H. Keith, III, appeals the magistrate judge’s decision * upholding the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny Keith’s application for additional retirement benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 417 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Keith v. Commissioner of SSA, No. CA-01-131-1-JKB (D. Md. filed June 16, 2004; entered June 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin H. Keith, III, appeals the magistrate judge’s decision * upholding the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny Keith’s application for additional retirement benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 417 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Keith v. Commissioner of SSA, No. CA-01-131-1-JKB (D. Md. filed June 16, 2004; entered June 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 F. App'x 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack