Keith v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.

240 A.D. 839

This text of 240 A.D. 839 (Keith v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keith v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co., 240 A.D. 839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order granting motion for an injunction pendente lite reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The trustee is responsible for its acts in the administration of the trust estate and will be charged on an accounting if there be improper acts or omissions. Equity should not interfere save where there is proof of fraud or collusion. There is no such proof here. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm; Scudder, J., dissents on the ground that the conditions of sale imposed by the trustee unduly restrict bidding and may work gross injustice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-v-chemical-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1933.