Keith Milo Taylor v. David Baumbarner James Vaughn
This text of 798 F.2d 1409 (Keith Milo Taylor v. David Baumbarner James Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
798 F.2d 1409
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Keith Milo TAYLOR, Plaintiff-appellant,
v.
David BAUMBARNER; James Vaughn, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-6643.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 29, 1986.
Decided Aug. 29, 1986.
Keith Milo Taylor, appellant pro se.
Jacob L. Safron, Office of the Attorey General, for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Baumgarner, C/A No. 85-1485-CRT (E.D.N.C., May 28, 1986) .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 F.2d 1409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-milo-taylor-v-david-baumbarner-james-vaughn-ca4-1986.