Keith Matthews v. Patrick Pierre

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 15, 2023·No. 22-3495·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 22-3495

Keith Dewayne Matthews

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Patrick Pierre, Correctional Sergeant, Cummins Unit

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Debra Lungsford, Correctional Sergeant, Cummins Unit; Corey Haynie

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Submitted: August 3, 2023 Filed: August 15, 2023

[Unpublished]

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Keith Matthews appeals an adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis to reverse the district court.1 See Morris v. Cradduck, 954 F.3d 1055, 1058 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Matthews’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied as moot.

1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Edie R. Ervin, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith Matthews v. Patrick Pierre, (8th Cir. 2023).

Keith Matthews v. Patrick Pierre (Keith Matthews v. Patrick Pierre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mark Morris v. Kelley Cradduck
954 F.3d 1055 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)