Keith Malley v. State of Florida
This text of Keith Malley v. State of Florida (Keith Malley v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
KEITH MALLEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0086
[January 14, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2023-CF-007620- AXXX-MB.
Carlos A. Canet of Law Office of Carlos A. Canet, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals his jury trial convictions for intentional interference with custody, culpable negligence and misdemeanor battery. We write to address only the defendant’s conviction for culpable negligence (“Count 2”), which we reverse and remand for correction of the judgment.
On Count 2, the circuit court entered judgment against the defendant for culpable negligence in violation of section 784.05(2), Florida Statutes (2023) (a first-degree misdemeanor that requires proof of an actual injury). The jury instructions explicitly stated that actual injury was not required to convict the defendant of Count 2; instead, the State needed to prove only that the defendant had exposed the child to personal injury and that the defendant did so through culpable negligence.
The jury instructions thus described only a violation of section 784.05(1), Florida Statutes (2023) (a second-degree misdemeanor that requires exposing another person to personal injury). Furthermore, the State conceded no evidence existed of an actual injury to the child. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction for culpable negligence as a first- degree misdemeanor was error. See Gibson v. State, 379 So. 3d 576, 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024).
Thus, we reverse the defendant’s conviction under Count 2 for culpable negligence as a first-degree misdemeanor in violation of section 784.05(2), and remand for Count 2 of the judgment to be corrected to reflect a conviction for culpable negligence as a second-degree misdemeanor in violation of section 784.05(1). See id. In all other respects, we affirm without comment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with instructions.
KUNTZ, C.J., CONNER and SHAW, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Keith Malley v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-malley-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.