Keith MacHinery Corp. v. South Plainfield
221 A.2d 47, 91 N.J. Super. 469
Opinion
KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND JOHN BORI, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Edward J. Santoro, attorney).
Mr. Robert Silver argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder, Silver & McCurley, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated by Judge Gerofsky in his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keith MacHinery Corp. v. South Plainfield, 221 A.2d 47, 91 N.J. Super. 469 (N.J. Ct. App. 1966).
221 A.2d 47 (Keith MacHinery Corp. v. South Plainfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diament v. Borough of Fort Lee
3 N.J. Tax 70 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1981)