Keith Head v. State
Opinion
Order filed January 16, 2020
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-18-00925-CR
KEITH HEAD, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 399th Judicial District Court Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2011CR6417B
ORDER
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion requesting to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion was granted and an order to that effect issued.
In response, we have received documentation that the record was sent to appellant but have not received the certification from the clerk of the court as to the date on which delivery of the record to appellant was made.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 56th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keith Head v. State (Keith Head v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.