Keith Edmund Gavin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Keith Edmund Gavin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 F.4th 1247
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 10, 2020·No. 20-11271·Published

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-11271 Date Filed: 12/10/2020 Page: 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-11271-P

KEITH EDMUND GAVIN, Petitioner - Appellee Cross -Appellant, versus

COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellant Cross Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Before: JORDAN, BRANCH, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

Appellee Cross-Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the October 23, 2020 order is DENIED.

USCA11 Case: 20-11271 Date Filed: 12/10/2020 Page: 2 of 2

JORDAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Based upon the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in cases like Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-75 (2017), I would grant Mr. Gavin’s motion for reconsideration, and issue a COA on whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the guilt phase.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith Edmund Gavin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, (11th Cir. 2020).

Keith Edmund Gavin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections (Keith Edmund Gavin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buck v. Davis
580 U.S. 100 (Supreme Court, 2017)