Keith E. Matteri v. State
This text of 2017 WY 51 (Keith E. Matteri v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Affirming the District Court’s Judgment and Sentence
E. JAMES BURKE, Chief Justice
[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification *903 that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered unconditional pleas of “nolo contendere” to two counts: possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and aggravated assault and battery. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(a)(i) and § 6-2-502(a)(i). The district court imposed consecutive sentences of 8 to 12 years and 4⅜ to 6 years. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s June 20, 2016, “Judgment Upon Pleas of Nolo Contendere” and its September 8, 2016, “Sentence.”
[¶2] On March 9, 2017, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court entered an “Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief.” This Court ordered that, on or before April 24, 2017, Appellant “may file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like this Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal.” The Court notes that Appellant did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted.
[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief’ submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s “Judgment Upon Pleas of Nolo Contendere” and its “Sentence” should be affirmed. It is, therefore,
[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant, Keith E. Matteri, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further
[¶5] ORDERED that the district court’s June 20, 2016, “Judgment Upon Pleas of Nolo Contendere” and its September 8, 2016, “Sentence,” which were entered in district court criminal cases 7097 and 7516, be, and the same hereby are, affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/E. JAMES BURKE Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 WY 51, 393 P.3d 902, 2017 WL 1908665, 2017 Wyo. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-e-matteri-v-state-wyo-2017.