Keith E. Booth v. Total Health Care

Fourth Circuit

Keith E. Booth v. Total Health Care

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11000, 1995 WL 107357

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 15, 1995

Docket94-2129

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Keith E. Booth v. Total Health Care) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keith E. Booth v. Total Health Care, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11000, 1995 WL 107357 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Keith E. BOOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TOTAL HEALTH CARE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided March 15, 1995.

Keith E. Booth, Appellant Pro Se.

Monte Fried, Wright, Constable & Skeen, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order that granted summary judgment to the Defendant in his action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1994). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Booth v. Total Health Care, No. CA-93-4015-JFM (D.Md. Aug. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and decline to consider Appellant's supplementary affidavits because these materials were not before the district court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Keith E. BOOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TOTAL HEALTH CARE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2129.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided March 15, 1995.

Keith E. Booth, Appellant Pro Se.

Monte Fried, Wright, Constable & Skeen, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order that granted summary judgment to the Defendant in his action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1994). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Booth v. Total Health Care, No. CA-93-4015-JFM (D.Md. Aug. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and decline to consider Appellant's supplementary affidavits because these materials were not before the district court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11000, 1995 WL 107357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-e-booth-v-total-health-care-ca4-1995.