Keith Brown v. Paul K. Delo

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 14, 1996·No. 95-2362·Unpublished

Opinion

_____________

No. 95-2362EM _____________

Keith E. Brown, also known as * Keith Brown; * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Andre Evans, also known as * Andre Evans-Bey, * * Plaintiff, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Paul K. Delo, Supt; Norma * District Court for the Eastern Lavran, Captain; Lonnie Salts, * District of Missouri. Lieutenant; Phillip Nixon, * Sargeant; James McGinley, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sargeant; David McPeak, COI; * Joseph Holloway, COI; Donald * Beauchamp, COI; Lloyd Hodges, * COI; Earnest Jarvis, COI; * William Kitchell, COI; William * Major, COII; Unknown Davis, * COI; Greg Wilson; Fred Treece; * Charles W. Harris, CSII; Karen * Festenmaker; L. Rosenberg; Don * Roper, Asst. Supt., * * Defendants-Appellees. * _____________

Submitted: June 7, 1996

Filed: June 14, 1996 _____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, Keith E. Brown, a Missouri inmate, challenges the amended judgment awarding nominal damages following a zero-damage jury award against two of the defendants in Brown's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force action. Brown also contends the district court improperly denied Brown's motion for new trial on the issue of damages. Because this appeal involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, an extended discussion is not warranted. We are unable to review the nominal damage award because Brown failed to provide a complete transcript on appeal. Brattrud v. Town of Exline, 628 F.2d 1098, 1099 (8th Cir. 1980) (per curiam). Contrary to Brown's view, a finding of Eighth Amendment liability does not require an award of actual or punitive damages. See Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 52 (1983); Cummings v. Malone, 995 F.2d 817, 822-23 (8th Cir. 1993). Also, the district court's submission of a defective nominal damage instruction (stating the jury "may" rather than "must" award nominal damages) does not constitute plain error. See Warren v. Fanning, 950 F.2d 1370, 1374 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 836 (1992). Finally, the district court did not commit error in requiring Brown to pay costs under Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See O'Brien v. City of Greers Ferry, 873 F.2d 1115, 1120 (8th Cir. 1989). We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keith Brown v. Paul K. Delo, (8th Cir. 1996).

Keith Brown v. Paul K. Delo (Keith Brown v. Paul K. Delo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Wade
461 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Brattrud v. Town of Exline
628 F.2d 1098 (Eighth Circuit, 1980)
Cummings v. Malone
995 F.2d 817 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)