Keith Barkley v. State of Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7495

KEITH BARKLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; CSM O’LEARY,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00399-GLR)

Submitted: February 29, 2016 Decided: March 15, 2016

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Barkley, Appellant Pro Se. Michael O’Connor Doyle, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith Barkley appeals the district court’s order granting

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Barkley v. Maryland,

No. 1:14-cv-00399-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2015). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED