Keith B. Abell and Robert E. Caine v. Leroy Hoots

Fourth Circuit

Keith B. Abell and Robert E. Caine v. Leroy Hoots

315 F.2d 629, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5636

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 8, 1963

Docket8835_1

StatusPublished

This text of 315 F.2d 629 (Keith B. Abell and Robert E. Caine v. Leroy Hoots) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keith B. Abell and Robert E. Caine v. Leroy Hoots, 315 F.2d 629, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5636 (4th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

315 F.2d 629

Keith B. ABELL and Robert E. Caine, Appellees,
v.
LeRoy HOOTS, Appellant.

No. 8835.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 2, 1963.

Decided April 8, 1963.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem; L. Richardson Preyer, District Judge.

Fred S. Hutchins, Winston-Salem, N. C. (Deal, Hutchins & Minor, Winston-Salem, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

Karl N. Hill, Jr., Greensboro, N. C. (Welch Jordan; Jordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols, and Sapp & Sapp, Greensboro, N. C., on brief), for appellees.

Before BOREMAN, BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This motor vehicle accident case was tried before the District Court without a jury. Upon examination of the record we conclude that the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI