Keith A. Noe v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Penitentiary
This text of 353 F.2d 282 (Keith A. Noe v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant was convicted of first degree burglary, and his conviction was affirmed on appeal to the state supreme court (State v. Noe, 1963, 93 Ariz. 373, 381 P.2d 99). He later sought habeas corpus in the state court, which was denied.
We have examined the transcript and the exhibits, and we conclude that the evidence supports the findings of fact, that the findings support the conclusions of law, and that the decision is correct.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
353 F.2d 282, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keith-a-noe-v-frank-a-eyman-warden-arizona-state-penitentiary-ca9-1965.