Keisler v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Keisler v. State

160 S.W.3d 346, 357 Ark. 88, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 232

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 22, 2004

DocketCR 04-354

StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.W.3d 346 (Keisler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keisler v. State, 160 S.W.3d 346, 357 Ark. 88, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 232 (Ark. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Michael Raymond Keisler, by and through am. attorney, Phyllis J. Lemons, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Ms. Lemons admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record due to a mistake on her part.

A judgment was entered against Mr. Keisler on August 25, 2003. He timely filed a notice of appeal on September 10, 2003, claiming that he had ordered the transcript of the circuit court record, but that it had not been tendered by his attorney, Ms. Lemons. The circuit court first extended Mr. Keisler’s deadline for filing the transcript to February 6, 2004, and, again, to April 9, 2004. Ms. Lemons received the transcript from the circuit court on March 26, 2004, and tendered it to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office on March 30, 2004. Because the March 25, 2004 deadline had expired, Ms. Lemons’s transcript was untimely.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Glaze, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Michael Raymond Keisler, by and through am. attorney, Phyllis J. Lemons, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Ms. Lemons admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record due to a mistake on her part.

A judgment was entered against Mr. Keisler on August 25, 2003. He timely filed a notice of appeal on September 10, 2003, claiming that he had ordered the transcript of the circuit court record, but that it had not been tendered by his attorney, Ms. Lemons. The circuit court first extended Mr. Keisler’s deadline for filing the transcript to February 6, 2004, and, again, to April 9, 2004. Ms. Lemons received the transcript from the circuit court on March 26, 2004, and tendered it to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office on March 30, 2004. Because the March 25, 2004 deadline had expired, Ms. Lemons’s transcript was untimely.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Glaze, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 S.W.3d 346, 357 Ark. 88, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keisler-v-state-ark-2004.