Keishunn Lamont Reed v. State
This text of Keishunn Lamont Reed v. State (Keishunn Lamont Reed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order filed February 9, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-18-00882-CR NO. 14-18-00883-CR ____________
KEISHUNN LAMONT REED, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 208th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1380046, 1380047
ORDER
On February 4, 2020, this court directed the trial court to conduct a hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. Our order required the trial judge to see that a record of the hearing was made and ordered the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s signed order ruling on the motion for new trial. The transcribed record of the hearing and the courts order were to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before May 4, 2020.
Due to pandemic related scheduling issues and the trial court’s determination that because of the constitutional claims involved an electronic hearing was not sufficient, the trial court has been greatly delayed in holding this hearing. The trial court has kept this court apprised of the delays and this court is assured the hearing will be held in a just, fair, and safe manner. Accordingly, we continue the abatement of this appeal for another 60 days.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s ruling and a record of the hearing is filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date. We order the trial court to conduct the hearing and file the record by April 12, 2021.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Keishunn Lamont Reed v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keishunn-lamont-reed-v-state-texapp-2021.