Keiser v. Yandes

Indiana Supreme Court

Keiser v. Yandes

42 Ind. 399

DecidedMay 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ind. 399 (Keiser v. Yandes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keiser v. Yandes, 42 Ind. 399 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Downey, J.

The judgment, from which the appeal in this case is taken, was rendered in favor of the appellee against George Keiser, George Nichol, Amos J. King, Edward T. Sinker, Daniel Yandes, Sr., and George B. Yandes. The appeal is taken and the errors assigned by Keiser, Nichol, and King only, and there is no notice served on the other judgment defendants, as required by sec. 551, p. 270, 2 G. & H. The appeal must, for this reason, be dismissed. Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Downey, J.

The judgment, from which the appeal in this case is taken, was rendered in favor of the appellee against George Keiser, George Nichol, Amos J. King, Edward T. Sinker, Daniel Yandes, Sr., and George B. Yandes. The appeal is taken and the errors assigned by Keiser, Nichol, and King only, and there is no notice served on the other judgment defendants, as required by sec. 551, p. 270, 2 G. & H. The appeal must, for this reason, be dismissed. Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Ind. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keiser-v-yandes-ind-1873.