Keiser v. Melman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keiser v. Melman

247 A.D. 716

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars unanimously modified by granting items 1, 2, 4, 6, 6, and 10 to 16, inclusive, of the notice of motion; item 7, to the extent of requiring a statement of the approximate date when plaintiff claims his wife was enticed; and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars unanimously modified by granting items 1, 2, 4, 6, 6, and 10 to 16, inclusive, of the notice of motion; item 7, to the extent of requiring a statement of the approximate date when plaintiff claims his wife was enticed; and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Keiser v. Melman, 247 A.D. 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 716 (Keiser v. Melman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.