Keiser v. Melman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Keiser v. Melman

247 A.D. 716

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 716 (Keiser v. Melman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keiser v. Melman, 247 A.D. 716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars unanimously modified by granting items 1, 2, 4, 6, 6, and 10 to 16, inclusive, of the notice of motion; item 7, to the extent of requiring a statement of the approximate date when plaintiff claims his wife was enticed; and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars unanimously modified by granting items 1, 2, 4, 6, 6, and 10 to 16, inclusive, of the notice of motion; item 7, to the extent of requiring a statement of the approximate date when plaintiff claims his wife was enticed; and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion. Present — McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keiser-v-melman-nyappdiv-1936.