Keiser v. Cox

Appellate Court of Illinois

Keiser v. Cox

16 Ill. App. 631, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 85

DecidedAugust 20, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ill. App. 631 (Keiser v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keiser v. Cox, 16 Ill. App. 631, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 85 (Ill. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Conger J.

For a full statement of this case see Cox et al. v. Keiser, 15 Bradwell, 432.

The case having been reversed and remanded by this court, the Circuit Court of McLean county, in accordance with the opinion of this court as found in 15 Bradwell, dismissed the original and amended petitions at the cost-of appellant.

From that decree this appeal is taken. Substantially the same questions arise that were before this court on the former appeal, and we are asked to review that decision; for were we to enter into a consideration of the merits of the controversy, and especially the effect upon the right of action of taking the acceptances, it would simply be reviewing the action of this court upon the first appeal. We have neither the power nor disposition to do this. These questions are res judicata. Moshier v. Horton, 100 Ill. 63; Ogle v. Turpin, 8 Bradwell, 453. The decree of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conger J.

For a full statement of this case see Cox et al. v. Keiser, 15 Bradwell, 432.

The case having been reversed and remanded by this court, the Circuit Court of McLean county, in accordance with the opinion of this court as found in 15 Bradwell, dismissed the original and amended petitions at the cost-of appellant.

From that decree this appeal is taken. Substantially the same questions arise that were before this court on the former appeal, and we are asked to review that decision; for were we to enter into a consideration of the merits of the controversy, and especially the effect upon the right of action of taking the acceptances, it would simply be reviewing the action of this court upon the first appeal. We have neither the power nor disposition to do this. These questions are res judicata. Moshier v. Horton, 100 Ill. 63; Ogle v. Turpin, 8 Bradwell, 453. The decree of the circuit court must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ill. App. 631, 1885 Ill. App. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keiser-v-cox-illappct-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack