Keiper v. Miller

70 F. 128, 16 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2477
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 1895
DocketNo. 21
StatusPublished

This text of 70 F. 128 (Keiper v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keiper v. Miller, 70 F. 128, 16 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2477 (3d Cir. 1895).

Opinion

Reversed, per stipulation of counsel, and remanded to the court below for further proceedings by agreed decree in the circuit court, as hereto annexed: First, that the equities are with the complainants; second, that the patent mentioned and described in the bill of complaint, and upon which suit is brought, granted to Samuel M. Brua, November 12, 1878 (No. 209,795), is valid, and the defendant has infringed the same in manner and form as in the bill of complaint alleged; and, third, all matters in controversy and claims in dispute between complainants and the defendant having been fully compromised, adjusted, and finally settled, an injunction and accounting are waived.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 F. 128, 16 C.C.A. 679, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keiper-v-miller-ca3-1895.