Keilon Marcel Wright v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 12, 2019
Docket05-19-00111-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Keilon Marcel Wright v. State (Keilon Marcel Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keilon Marcel Wright v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 12, 2019.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00111-CR

KEILON MARCEL WRIGHT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17-55629-P

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Molberg, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Molberg Keilon Marcel Wright appeals his conviction for evading arrest or detention with a vehicle.

After appellant entered an open plea of guilty, the trial court found him guilty and assessed

punishment at ten years in prison. Appellant then filed his notice of appeal.

A defendant perfects his appeal by timely filing a written notice of appeal with the trial

court clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c). To be timely, the notice of appeal must be filed within

thirty days after the date sentence was imposed or within ninety days after sentencing if the

defendant timely filed a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). In the absence of a timely

perfected notice of appeal, the Court must dismiss the appeal. Ex parte Castillo, 369 S.W.3d 196,

198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). The trial court imposed sentence on December 20, 2018. Thus, appellant had to file a

timely filed motion for new trial or notice of appeal by January 19, 2019. The clerk’s record shows

appellant filed his notice of appeal in this case on January 24, 2019; that same day, he also filed a

motion for new trial. Both the notice of appeal and the motion for new trial were untimely.

Appellant did not file with this Court a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.3. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely, we must dismiss this appeal.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)

190111F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

KEILON MARCEL WRIGHT, Appellant On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-19-00111-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F17-55629-P. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Whitehill and Reichek participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 12th day of April, 2019.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaro
369 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Keilon Marcel Wright v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keilon-marcel-wright-v-state-texapp-2019.