Keiler v. Keiler

13 Misc. 2d 441, 180 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3112
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 17, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and the facts and new trial granted, with $30 costs to plaintiff to abide the event. Appeal from “directed verdict ’ ’ dismissed; no appeal lies therefrom. The evidence presented a question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury as to whether, under all of the circumstances here present, it was plaintiff’s intention to waive her rights under the separation agreement by the commencement of the action [442] for separation (Hettich v. Hettich, 304 N. Y. 8; Schmelzel v. Schmelzel, 287 N. Y. 21; Galusha v. Galusha, 116 N. Y. 635; Goldman v. Goldman, 282 N. Y. 296). It was therefore error to direct a verdict in favor of defendant.'

Concur- — - Pette, Hast and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keiler v. Keiler, 13 Misc. 2d 441, 180 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

13 Misc. 2d 441 (Keiler v. Keiler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kulok v. Kulok
40 Misc. 2d 999 (New York District Court, 1963)