Keil v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Keil v. State

105 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 680

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 11, 1925

Docket6 Div. 790.

StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 924 (Keil v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keil v. State, 105 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 680 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was tried and convicted, in the lower court, for a violation of the prohibition laws. The undisputed evidence disclosed that the defendant was traveling in an automobile within the jurisdiction of the circuit court of the Bessemer division of the Tenth judicial circuit, and that he had in the car at the time about 35 gallons of whisky, which was contained in seven 5-gallon cans. An examination of the record convinces us that his conviction for the offense charged was proper, and without error. There is no merit in any of the exceptions reserved to the court’s rulings upon the admission of the testimony, nor upon the pleadings. There being no error apparent on the record, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant was tried and convicted, in the lower court, for a violation of the prohibition laws. The undisputed evidence disclosed that the defendant was traveling in an automobile within the jurisdiction of the circuit court of the Bessemer division of the Tenth judicial circuit, and that he had in the car at the time about 35 gallons of whisky, which was contained in seven 5-gallon cans. An examination of the record convinces us that his conviction for the offense charged was proper, and without error. There is no merit in any of the exceptions reserved to the court’s rulings upon the admission of the testimony, nor upon the pleadings. There being no error apparent on the record, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keil-v-state-alactapp-1925.