Keil v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
91 N.Y.S. 1099
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held that, the trial court having granted a new trial, unless the plaintiff stipulate to reduce the verdict, we think it ought not to be held that the imposition of such a condition was an abuse of discretion requiring the reversal of said order by this court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Keil v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad, 91 N.Y.S. 1099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
91 N.Y.S. 1099 (Keil v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.