Keiko Ono Aoki v. Kana Aoki Nootenboom

952 N.E.2d 1061, 17 N.Y.3d 754, 929 N.Y.S.2d 68, 2011 NY Slip Op 4771
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 2011
Docket182 SSM 22
StatusPublished

This text of 952 N.E.2d 1061 (Keiko Ono Aoki v. Kana Aoki Nootenboom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keiko Ono Aoki v. Kana Aoki Nootenboom, 952 N.E.2d 1061, 17 N.Y.3d 754, 929 N.Y.S.2d 68, 2011 NY Slip Op 4771 (N.Y. 2011).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. We agree with the Appellate Division that Surrogate’s Court did not abuse its discretion by setting a December *755 2009 deadline for the completion of discovery and limiting the identity and number of individuals to be deposed.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
952 N.E.2d 1061, 17 N.Y.3d 754, 929 N.Y.S.2d 68, 2011 NY Slip Op 4771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keiko-ono-aoki-v-kana-aoki-nootenboom-ny-2011.