Keigher, Richard Jerry v. Pady, Colman Boyd, Waste Management of Texas Inc., a Texas Corporation and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Garbage Gobbler

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 22, 2000
Docket13-99-00653-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Keigher, Richard Jerry v. Pady, Colman Boyd, Waste Management of Texas Inc., a Texas Corporation and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Garbage Gobbler (Keigher, Richard Jerry v. Pady, Colman Boyd, Waste Management of Texas Inc., a Texas Corporation and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Garbage Gobbler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keigher, Richard Jerry v. Pady, Colman Boyd, Waste Management of Texas Inc., a Texas Corporation and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Garbage Gobbler, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-99-653-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

RICHARD JERRY KEIGHER

, Appellant,

v.


COLMAN BOYD PADY, ET AL.

, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court
of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N


Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Rodriguez and
Kennedy(1)

Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, RICHARD JERRY KEIGHER, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 156th District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-98-0019-CV-B. The clerk's record was filed on December 8, 1999. The reporter's record was filed on February 24, 2000. Appellant's brief was due on May 15, 2000. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On June 2, 2000, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 22nd day of June, 2000

1. Retired Justice Noah Kennedy assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §74.003 (Vernon 1998).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 74.003
Texas GV § 74.003

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Keigher, Richard Jerry v. Pady, Colman Boyd, Waste Management of Texas Inc., a Texas Corporation and Waste Management of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Garbage Gobbler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keigher-richard-jerry-v-pady-colman-boyd-waste-management-of-texas-texapp-2000.