Kehoe v. Patton

42 A. 868, 21 R.I. 223, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 18
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMarch 10, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 A. 868 (Kehoe v. Patton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kehoe v. Patton, 42 A. 868, 21 R.I. 223, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 18 (R.I. 1899).

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

(1) (2) The defendant’s special plea in bar rests on the assumption that the bringing of the suit in equity by the plaintiff against Peter Doyle and the defendant was an election of his remedy, and that such an election is a bar to the present suit. We do not think, however, that the mere bringing of the suit in equity, it not having proceeded to final decree, amounts to an election (Jenks v. Smith, 14 R. I. 634; Quidnick Co. v. Chafee, 13 R. I. 367, 369), and therefore we are of opinion that the plea is not sufficient. The defendant’s remedy is by motion to require the plaintiff to elect whether he will proceed in the suit in equity or by the present action.

The demurrer is sustained and the plea overruled. Case remitted to the Common Pleas Division for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Home Savings Bank v. Rolando
14 A.2d 822 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1940)
Williams, Et Ux. v. Robineau
168 So. 644 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 A. 868, 21 R.I. 223, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kehoe-v-patton-ri-1899.