Kehoe v. LONDON GUARANTEE & ACCIDENT INS. CO.
106 N.E.2d 59, 303 N.Y. 973
This text of 106 N.E.2d 59 (Kehoe v. LONDON GUARANTEE & ACCIDENT INS. CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kehoe v. LONDON GUARANTEE & ACCIDENT INS. CO., 106 N.E.2d 59, 303 N.Y. 973 (N.Y. 1952).
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of Evelyn D. Kehoe, Respondent,
v.
London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co., et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Neile F. Towner and Julian B. Erway for appellants.
Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Daniel Polansky, Wendell P. Brown and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.
Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Claim of Kehoe v. London Guarantee & Accident Insurance
106 N.E.2d 59 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 N.E.2d 59, 303 N.Y. 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kehoe-v-london-guarantee-accident-ins-co-ny-1952.